From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [solved]: Re: Finding last *Async Shell Command* buffer? Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 23:05:31 +0300 Message-ID: References: <838s6aqtlv.fsf@gnu.org> <8335wiqrek.fsf@gnu.org> <831rc2qi35.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuoyp2t1.fsf@gnu.org> <83sg4ioztv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31922"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 26 21:38:42 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lPtE9-0008B3-Na for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 21:38:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43986 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPtE8-0000M0-LF for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:38:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPskb-0006wb-JV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:39291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPskZ-00012b-Cm; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.58]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 0000000000027F30.00000000605E3F23.00002A78; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:08:02 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83sg4ioztv.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:128663 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2021-03-26 15:38]: > > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:48:49 +0300 > > From: Jean Louis > > Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > > > > > Sure, that is clear. I also refer to buffers like that. But how they > > > > get assigned their number on the end like *Async Shell Command*<141> > > > > it does not matter, so it could be 39 or 175, it does not matter. > > > > > > Doesn't matter for your use case. But not necessarily for others. > > > > I wish I could understand the practical usage you describe. > > Why do you need to understand it? Isn't it clear, up front, that > changing some old behavior runs a clear risk of breaking someone's > habits or code that relies on that behavior? OK that is what you mean. Now is clear, of course.