From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Fix" sag scaling for hidpi Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:00:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <9C04F72C-1BB6-4308-AD8E-4A2B471CAC4E@gmail.com> <871rdkte4f.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mgqj60.fsf@gnus.org> <87czx4ovh5.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24257"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Yuan Fu , Robert Pluim , Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 13 17:02:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAxN8-0006CO-Vv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 17:02:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36336 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAxN8-0004Ag-0X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 11:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAxLS-000355-7B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 11:00:30 -0500 Original-Received: from outbound.soverin.net ([2a01:4f8:fff0:2d:8::218]:40829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAxLQ-00060R-K0; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 11:00:29 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01CD0600D0; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=idiocy.org; s=soverin; t=1613232025; bh=o32TXEXdqJzpbRF/pEjvhAClaHKUl5RZC01dJJxhKK8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oTs0RlvqreX98J03YF/jubbQIURp/LRLpRjdyakQP+SeTtpoLzUhRzpX2LEZC/oV2 rxfDGOtkgp6GtHIxnyuUxjFnAsAAxWES47Iktcq8BbS9tnuZllU9/KNwrR6AZWbVAe jwQwD3Io/JAy5pAXF8eG9wQ1izY49rPR3HZ7bCWxAloAWOlpc+gLNA9Xv/MFtSEaQ1 ee5y6Oy9cIJhKxSZ8gPp0A9Tas2k0N/Rt2HdV4v6OcsNmhfXipsweOUilKIHB/eOO3 Imqmk63GDHfZqhSX8NUJ/F9KjOkD9EBxCNM5bk7PxvPf+EvlkEfvwXPsEiJlMfioRD RN/OO6YSZufqw== Original-Received: by breton.holly.idiocy.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id E0791202A66D2C; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:00:21 +0000 (GMT) Mail-Followup-To: Alan Third , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Yuan Fu , emacs-devel , Eli Zaretskii , Robert Pluim , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87czx4ovh5.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f8:fff0:2d:8::218; envelope-from=alan@idiocy.org; helo=outbound.soverin.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264641 Archived-At: On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 04:09:26PM +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Alan Third writes: > > > But I've added code to shrink raster images as on macOS (and PGTK) > > they are also displayed at the logical size. This is probably less of > > a problem than with SVGs as often you can't really tell, but I'm of > > the opinion that if I open an image in an image viewer (I'm > > considering image-mode as an image viewer) I'd expect it to be the > > physical size. Perhaps this is wrong and most people expect the > > logical size. > > I expect the logical size in an image viewer. OK, I'll remove that code. -- Alan Third