From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:34:54 +0300 Message-ID: References: <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <5588fb25805d486be704@heytings.org> <878s82esdi.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17610"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) Cc: Joost Kremers , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 08:39:01 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAT2b-0004UP-IO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:39:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44024 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAT2a-0006La-L1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:39:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAT1L-0005pC-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:37:43 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:57449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAT1J-0000Ud-EA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:37:43 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.3]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000001E079.0000000060263042.00003333; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:37:37 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Drew Adams , Joost Kremers , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264460 Archived-At: * Drew Adams [2021-02-05 21:57]: > > Perhaps a better way to update the documented key > > binding conventions is to add the rule that packages > > should generally not create global key bindings. > > As I mentioned earlier, my position on that is > that (1) we can document that it's generally a > good idea for 3rd-party code to only suggest > such bindings, and not actually create them, > but (2) there's no convention that 3rd-party > code should not or must not create such bindings. That is good idea and if adopted, then it shall become part of the Emacs Lisp manual as new normative example.