From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Redisplaying text in both display margins? Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:02:17 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87a6t546pl.fsf@bydasein.com> <8335yx7y8s.fsf@gnu.org> <01e529e1bfecb8e32c9d737ebfd26140@bydasein.com> <83v9biz7z8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34336"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 27 19:53:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4pws-0008qd-CV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:53:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50296 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4pwr-0008OW-F3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:53:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4p9J-0006j0-5A for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from outbound.soverin.net ([2a01:4f8:fff0:2d:8::218]:50395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4p9G-0003M1-8E; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:02:36 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5A06008F; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.138]) by soverin.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=idiocy.org; s=soverin; t=1611770542; bh=ICd7gSOXFaEka7Vb40DCP2rjiz/ogMCm3sVnXhfK1ck=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=d78PkbdQkqRChhXy8gMlFfflH/sLwj2uKa77V61B+ObB1iKTH32PeS2kehCNCSdM1 4KF7+SlJGuZyKIBoaiBxxSyx2nFOR1x3kiYdKHjVhUASlruPM11+kvb58AZJGBkzvO yhTXRj590ClGtC29sJaRGndCxePhA8B+ckDPd/Z9MxxQyq6qb966XR/anGvM7AvVgP N24h+1Ro2IidGd7PgpYMf9inb82+VT8lRY2ni3M6P4pmrfNQrdZQa+jC+v5Wp0l3G5 CyWyCK5FsP6d43W38JENN1FDwrLZ0eKVYLJwYsK6x0FhqbwVKL+Js8oeqoaD6WNUry Q7H7Ku4c9eHQg== Original-Received: by breton.holly.idiocy.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id E2301202A02FD3; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:02:17 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83v9biz7z8.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f8:fff0:2d:8::218; envelope-from=alan@idiocy.org; helo=outbound.soverin.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:53:29 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:127391 Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:59:23PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Alan, could you please see if something similar is needed in nsterm.m > (my reading of the code indicates that it is already okay, but I'm not > sure). The symptom of the problem I fixed in xterm.c and w32term.c is > that when you execute the first part of the recipe in a single progn, > the first 2 lines are not cleared in the left margin area, you still > see portions of the comment originally displayed in the *scratch* > buffer. It looks OK here. I don't see what you describe. -- Alan Third