On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Michael Heerdegen wrote:
> <tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:
> 
> > I don't understand you. That function is most useful if you can
> > pass it a custom comparison function. I'd say it's fine as it
> > is.
> 
> I think the interpretation of the question "Could there be a better
> default comparison function?", in the sense that `eql' is a bit nicer
> than `eq' for specific value types, is valid, especially when
> considering that `cl-pushnew' is often used for configuration stuff or
> other purposes where speed is not crucial.

I see. Well, that train has sailed (or something). Backward compat
(especially with user's brains) and things.

Cheers
-- 
t