On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 02:04:13PM +0800, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote:
> Dear Emacs Developers,
> 
> I have recently found out that `walk-window-tree' always returns nil.
> 
> Is this intentional? It would make sense, at least to me, to return
> the "tree of fun return values". That would requires essentially, adding
> a few calls to cons.
> 
> Does this make sense? I haven't created an issue, because I thought
> that it might be intentional.

The nice thing about lexical binding is that you can have your cake
and eat it too... without spoiling other people's cakes :)

  (let ((wlist '()))
    (walk-window-tree (lambda (w) (setq wlist (cons w wlist))))
    (reverse wlist))

Cheers
-- 
t