From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58319: 29.0.50; Not logical compilation warnings Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 14:00:02 +0300 Message-ID: References: <86o7uq5ds3.fsf@protected.rcdrun.com> <26A6DA68-340D-41CB-8CC8-992C86320399@gmail.com> <878rltywdy.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2254"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.7+37 (a90f69b) (2022-09-02) Cc: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , 58319@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 07 16:54:24 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ogok3-0000KS-8V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 16:54:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43266 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogok1-0006gH-TK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:54:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogn59-0000g7-5C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogn58-00018J-Su for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ogn58-0007xG-O6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jean Louis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 58319-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58319.166514803930521 (code B ref 58319); Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2022 13:07:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ogn4Q-0007wD-Ls for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:42235) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ogn4O-0007vn-SJ for 58319@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:197.239.4.55]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 00000000000BA495.000000006340247F.00007962; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 06:07:11 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878rltywdy.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:244808 Archived-At: * Lars Ingebrigtsen [2022-10-06 16:06]: > Mattias Engdegård writes: > > > I've looked through the various contexts where the messages appear and > > the patch below (which keeps 'X-Y') should be an improvement in all > > cases. Anyone strongly against? > > I think your change looks like an improvement -- it clarifies without > making the warnings substantially longer. Cutting the meaning for purpose of making warnings shorter is detrimental. Warnings are for human and they are not stored anywhere. You waste no hard disk space. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/