From: Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>
To: Heinz Tuechler <tuechler@gmx.at>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:45:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+tmQq4fIZyqBpP7@protected.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9828052-c433-b3d5-0f94-b41191c242ad@gmx.at>
* Heinz Tuechler <tuechler@gmx.at> [2023-02-14 12:44]:
> Jean Louis wrote/hat geschrieben on/am 14.02.2023 07:00:
> > * tomas@tuxteam.de <tomas@tuxteam.de> [2023-02-12 16:50]:
> > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 12:33:40PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> > > > * Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> [2023-02-10 13:48]:
> > > > > Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > If you start adding in Org "fixed" time with UTC offset, that is a new
> > > > > > type of timestamp, as it is not common in world.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is how ISO8601 defines offsets.
> > > >
> > > > - did you say you wish to represent time with UTC time zone by using
> > > > UTC offset?
> > > >
> > > > - and I said, UTC time is always without offset, and if any is
> > > > represented then it must be +00
> > > >
> > > > - and now you say that ISO8601 defines offsets... sorry, you are
> > > > confusing me and readers.
> > >
> > > It is not about "the offset OF UTC". It is about "the offset
> > > RELATIVE TO UTC".
> >
> > Yes, surely is clear to me personally.
>
> If 2022-11-12 12:00+02 # 12:00 UTC+2 should mean that local time is
> 2022-11-12 12:00 and that it is 2 hours _ahead_ of UTC, then it seems
> intuitively clear to me. I would assume that holds for many others
> as well.
Exactly that. Never said anything different.
Discussion started from something like this:
2022-11-12 12:00+02 @UTC
and that is different case, where Ihor was suggesting that: 2022-11-12
12:00 is UTC time, not local time, where by +02 is offset (I say not
UTC offset) to be added or deducted on that time.
> > That we got for sure.
> >
> > Then just representation must be clear: @UTC is unclear in those
> > cases, but @RELTOUTC would be clear.
> >
>
> @RELTOUTC seems unfortunate, as it states only the obvious. If at all,
> it should be @AHEADUTC or @BEHINDUTC or some abbreviation of it, but as
> said above, it seems not necessary to me.
As idea I understand Ihor and other person on Internet.
But as implementation by using @UTC or by using date time
representation as UTC time with offset (not UTC offset), I think it
will be confusing for people, unless there is new tag invented to make
sure of it.
Any idea is fine:
2022-11-12 12:00+02 @UTC-SUM
2022-11-12 12:00+02 @UTC-TO
2022-11-12 12:00+02 @TO-UTC
but not
2022-11-12 12:00+02 @UTC
As that would be confusing.
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-04 21:38 [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda) Ypo
2023-02-05 3:12 ` Max Nikulin
2023-02-05 9:31 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-05 10:44 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-05 12:12 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-05 13:01 ` ypuntot
2023-02-06 14:15 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-07 21:38 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-06 14:10 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-07 22:19 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-08 10:36 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-10 3:29 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-10 10:48 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-12 9:33 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-12 13:47 ` tomas
2023-02-14 6:00 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-14 9:41 ` Heinz Tuechler
2023-02-14 9:45 ` tomas
2023-02-14 11:42 ` Max Nikulin
2023-02-14 15:59 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-14 16:45 ` Thomas S. Dye
2023-02-16 14:21 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-14 16:57 ` Max Nikulin
2023-02-14 10:45 ` Jean Louis [this message]
2023-03-10 10:46 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-03-08 13:30 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-03-10 1:37 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-11 4:44 ` Max Nikulin
2023-02-12 10:32 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-15 15:17 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-16 15:06 ` Jean Louis
2023-03-10 10:51 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-03-15 14:42 ` Max Nikulin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-02-12 13:27 Ypo
2023-02-04 18:59 ypuntot
2023-02-04 19:45 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-05 17:04 ` Max Nikulin
2023-02-07 21:46 ` Jean Louis
2023-01-17 3:55 [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda Daryl Manning
2023-01-17 8:22 ` Tim Cross
2023-01-17 9:15 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-01-17 9:45 ` Tim Cross
2023-01-18 9:15 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-01-18 11:43 ` Tim Cross
2023-01-18 12:02 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-01-18 21:16 ` Tim Cross
2023-01-19 5:29 ` Jean Louis
2023-01-19 7:23 ` Tim Cross
2023-01-19 14:32 ` Jean Louis
2023-01-19 20:09 ` Tim Cross
2023-01-19 23:02 ` Thomas S. Dye
2023-01-19 23:51 ` Tim Cross
2023-01-20 0:24 ` Thomas S. Dye
2023-01-20 3:46 ` Tim Cross
2023-01-20 6:14 ` Thomas S. Dye
2023-01-27 6:06 ` Sterling Hooten
2023-01-27 11:09 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-01-30 11:25 ` Greg Minshall
2023-01-31 11:48 ` [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda) Ihor Radchenko
2023-01-31 12:19 ` Daryl Manning
2023-01-31 12:41 ` Ihor Radchenko
[not found] ` <CAL9aZksf8AGF=dXg0KAtLPyu1ATt1fLpvdsjN6GMCuK2KRQ56w@mail.gmail.com>
2023-01-31 13:33 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-01-31 13:22 ` Jean Louis
2023-01-31 13:46 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-01-31 19:59 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-01 12:42 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-01 15:28 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-01 16:30 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-01-31 20:12 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-01 5:46 ` tomas
2023-02-01 7:29 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-01 7:52 ` Tim Cross
2023-02-01 8:32 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-01 8:46 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-01 9:38 ` Tim Cross
2023-02-01 10:15 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-01 14:53 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-01 16:36 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-01 10:46 ` Max Nikulin
2023-02-01 14:43 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-01 16:45 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-02 3:05 ` Max Nikulin
2023-02-02 8:59 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-01 14:38 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-01 16:50 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-01 7:00 ` Thomas S. Dye
2023-02-01 7:41 ` Jean Louis
2023-01-31 18:56 ` Greg Minshall
2023-02-01 12:48 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-01 12:52 ` tomas
2023-02-02 4:49 ` Greg Minshall
2023-01-31 20:41 ` Tim Cross
2023-01-31 23:50 ` Samuel Wales
2023-02-01 13:01 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-04 22:33 ` Samuel Wales
2023-02-04 22:49 ` Samuel Wales
2023-02-05 10:38 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-01 11:56 ` Christian Moe
2023-02-01 12:20 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-01 15:41 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-02 8:38 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-03 11:31 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-04 10:58 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-04 19:32 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-05 9:14 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-02 3:46 ` Timothy
2023-02-02 9:12 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-02 9:12 ` Timothy
2023-02-02 9:20 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-02 9:27 ` Timothy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+tmQq4fIZyqBpP7@protected.localdomain \
--to=bugs@gnu.support \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=tuechler@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.