From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43389: 28.0.50; Emacs memory leaks Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:43:56 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87h7pxjrh5.fsf@igel.home> <87eel1cq83.fsf@web.de> <4788A848-D51C-4A25-B023-BA029874DBE5@gnu.org> <87a6vpcphp.fsf@web.de> <83ft5h2pks.fsf@gnu.org> <87tutxi2cz.fsf@web.de> <87y2i9jebl.fsf@web.de> <87lfe8jm67.fsf@web.de> <87mtym7acc.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31570"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) Cc: 43389@debbugs.gnu.org, RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.Com, schwab@linux-m68k.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 09:39:25 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knHTx-00087w-5k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:39:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36818 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knHTw-0006V1-7q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 03:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knHNn-00006T-1t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 03:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53639) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knHNl-0007hc-P4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 03:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knHNl-0002oB-J5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 03:33:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jean Louis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43389 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43389-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43389.160758915710748 (code B ref 43389); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2020 08:32:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knHNN-0002nI-5K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 03:32:37 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:54503) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knHNL-0002n5-0a for 43389@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 03:32:35 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.31]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000001E525.000000005FD1DD1C.000012D4; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:32:27 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mtym7acc.fsf@web.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195626 Archived-At: * Michael Heerdegen [2020-12-10 03:51]: > Michael Heerdegen writes: > > > I think we see different symptoms. I don't see any slow-down at all > > (unless swapping starts, obviously). When I do M-x garbage-collect, it > > finishes immediately without freeing an significant amount of memory. > > I must correct myself. While this all was definitely the case the last > time I tried to investigate this issue (one or two months ago) the > garbage-collect statement is not true anymore. I did M-x > garbage-collect today when the memory was getting short and then Emacs > froze (in the sense of "didn't respond, even to C-g"), without gkrellm > reporting much progress, so I killed it (after 20 seconds or so - aeons > for a computer). > > I did not experience a slowdown, however (maybe I've faster RAM?). One time I waited for 36 minutes and it completed the garbage collection.