From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42374: 28.0.50; too many tramp messages after computer sleep Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 20:23:40 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20200721120604.GU26332@protected.rcdrun.com> <875zagri1n.fsf@gmx.de> <20200724070830.GO19439@protected.rcdrun.com> <87lfftyol2.fsf@gnus.org> <878sa7101s.fsf@gnus.org> <87v9dbyon9.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1nzx6vp.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9113"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) Cc: Michael Albinus , 42374@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 09 18:39:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kn3RC-0002E0-Hf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 18:39:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41246 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn3RB-0007iL-Iu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:39:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn3F0-00079t-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn3F0-0001vV-5J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kn3F0-0001Cg-1y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jean Louis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 17:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42374 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 42374-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42374.16075347924582 (code B ref 42374); Wed, 09 Dec 2020 17:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42374) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2020 17:26:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kn3EV-0001Bq-VQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:26:32 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:54165) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kn3ET-0001Ba-GK for 42374@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:26:30 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.31]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000001E440.000000005FD108BE.000047A7; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:26:22 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r1nzx6vp.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195557 Archived-At: * Lars Ingebrigtsen [2020-12-09 19:49]: > Jean Louis writes: > > > Development have made to me a strange policy to "close" something what > > is not really closed just because reporter does not follow up or > > cannot replicate it. Instead of swiping the dirt under the carpet > > maybe you should flag the message somehow as "unsolved" rather than > > closed. It gives false statistics and impression as it was not really > > "closed". > > The ones that are solved are marked as "fixed". (Well, in theory. We > don't actually care.) That is what I mean. No, I probably did not understand it as good. Thank you.