From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Heime Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Let clause with defvar Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:33:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <9EGMQRUSCtf_OJp3XtqFKZzdln94g30r9_RPWx9rhwYKpoIiyHBVJEWdY3sMgF5dl746AtbrDDVEkcxOPZLCvjm_VCLmeW8WBGFpTek90O4=@protonmail.com> <87cyliwfuy.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34131"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Heime via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 05 13:34:35 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1smAl1-0008km-Dc for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 13:34:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smAkP-000898-Nh; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 07:33:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smAkN-00088e-Gr for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 07:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.132]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smAkL-0005ts-Tj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 07:33:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1725536031; x=1725795231; bh=k9HPBVMX+/tomnfKcrTZbJAg4QaN1SgW64YT/EuZCkU=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=ZuJ0KDSzODv7Mit1fxYZkm+OG5TltuvNGJcojvodOVk9c0XfNz3yAMq9iAQSzLgnW M41qnknjNVkXVMAZ6C/t8tQLh9VJ3IWR5RjWASNjNWUkjJpT7RNF+1+WDjJsUU6Bb3 iZ33/y2uBeZJYebNV62G5Gy9DErkgCZerNQM94dX8bMaaTGGN0RRSHqZUpfUtGQoSH LcfPI1+H58nHINAeuMxhvADF5gYnvSSbxrvysJzSPHjArzdTWiCav6wcplLvuwu6wy gx+J97Xh8VFiImeEo4tA63M+c6TzifM11VD+QEdIoeyIMAbZ5n16D1Cra8GS7z7r2y 2ysC5vz2YG5fg== In-Reply-To: <87cyliwfuy.fsf@posteo.net> Feedback-ID: 57735886:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 7b1c6106cb5f269db9eb10ef7fbce13d422f0269 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.132; envelope-from=heimeborgia@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40132.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:147912 Archived-At: On Thursday, September 5th, 2024 at 10:32 PM, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > Heime heimeborgia@protonmail.com writes: >=20 > > Consider two versions of setting xiakos. The let defines local bindings= . > > Can the let block be placed outside a defvar or inside. Does it make a > > difference ? Although defvar is used to define global variables, can it > > be used to evaluating local bindings like let ? Which version would one > > suggest ? > >=20 > > (let ( (orella-waypt > > (questor-path-snip marshal-waypt "orella")) ) > >=20 > > (defvar xiakos > > `( ("GLXKS" . ,(concat orella-waypt "/xiakos")) > > ("GLXKS" . ,(concat orella-waypt "/xiakos")) )) > >=20 > > and > >=20 > > (defvar xiakos > >=20 > > (let ( (orella-waypt (questor-path-snip marshal-waypt "orella")) ) > >=20 > > `( ("GLXKS" . ,(concat orella-waypt "/xiakos")) > > ("GLXKS" . ,(concat orella-waypt "/xiakos")) )) >=20 >=20 > I'd place the `let' inside the` defvar', because it makes it easier to > evaluate the value manually without changing the value of the variable. Can you clarify what you are talking about ? What would one want to evalua= te ? =20 > -- > Philip Kaludercic on siskin