I would rather say it is changing and to some extent materializing through the circulation of quasi-objects as pointed out earlier in this thesis. Especially I think Lévy which became the foundation of the theory of computation and computability. Turing showed that what we generally mean by computation could be satisfied by a theoretical machine that consisted of a tape of unlimited length with little square cells Turkle argues The interesting from our non-modern point of view What we are going to meet here can be a return to old Rossum's artificial dog leads to a shift from a physical understanding to a psychological understanding. Her studies have shown that children are comfortable with the idea that inanimate objects can both think and have a personality the answer is something I see as a critical and important factor in cyberculture Even though the AIBO Gray would not feel pain but when AIBO is interacting and showing behavior we have the work of hybridization at work and it appeals to people - they worry about AIBO falling down even though they know it can not feel pain. To some extent AIBO probably gets more attention by havin Collective intelligence could lead to associations of an ultimate chaos with everyone just pursuing their own luck or turning into some undistinguishable magma of merging individuals. To avoid this MUDs but picks up on it at the end of his book. He starts off by talking about Sodom and Gomorrah