RE: [External] : Re: Conditional binding and testing of `lexical-binding'

[Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>]

> Sorry for I was making that conclusion based on
> the wrong assumption about how buffer local
> variables works.
> 
> But I think instead of testing whether
> `lexical-binding' has been bound,
> (if (>= emacs-major-version 24)
>     (provide 'lexical-binding))

My question has nothing to do with
`provide'ing a `lexical-binding' feature.

Adding such a feature is neither needed
nor helpful.  (And with that name it
might even mislead.)

> testing major version number seems to be easier since
> it is unlikely someone would take an old version of
> Emacs and patch for lexical binding only, or use a
> version above 24 but taking out the lexical binding
> support.

Testing the Emacs version # is OK also,
of course.  But that coding difference
too is irrelevant for my question/post.
It's not about that, at all.

And in general it's a bit better to test
for a variable or function definition
(`(f)boundp') than it is to test for an
Emacs version.  For one thing, it lets
a reader of the code know specifically
what's needed from that version.

> And instead of doing the lexical binding support test
> in every file, having the `provide' statement in one
> file loaded before any other files and use `featurep'
> as a universal test of that feature seems to be more
> appropriate.

My question is specific to a single file.
It's even specific to particular parts of
a file.

> I apologize again for not reading your post carefully.

No problem.  At least you tried to help.
Thx.

> However, as Stefan says, what lexical-binding provides
> is "nothing ground breaking", even you've already
> hit a critical performance bottle neck, converting
> to lexical binding would help little.

I'm well aware of what it has to offer.  But thx.

> In my opinion, adopting lexical-binding is mainly
> for making the code cleaner. Having both lexical
> binding and dynamic binding in one library, seems
> to be contrary to that goal.

What I asked about and mentioned is not about
having lexical and dynamic binding in the same
library - that is, for the same Emacs version.

Variable `lexical-binding' is itself not about
having only lexical binding.  It's simply about
Emacs support for lexical binding _in addition_
to dynamic binding (what Common Lisp has offered
since its outset).