From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>, Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
Cc: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
"emacs-devel@gnu.org" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [External] : Re: Question about completion behavior
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 20:48:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR10MB5488322127622168E9B8A751F30E9@SJ0PR10MB5488.namprd10.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86pmmpahdm.fsf@mail.linkov.net>
> In case of no completions it will be formatted to: "0 possible
> completions".
Why? Why wouldn't *Completions* just be
removed? And "[No match]" is already echoed.
Sounds like things are getting more, not less,
complicated for users (maybe overengineering?).
Why would we ever say "0 possible completions"?
Why bother with "possible"? We never show
IMpossible completions, do we?
When there are no matches we just tell users
there's no match. Always have. Simple.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-13 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220309001013.gxyh2uasbuxiz6ww.ref@Ergus>
2022-03-09 0:10 ` Question about completion behavior Ergus
2022-03-09 0:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-03-09 1:46 ` Ergus
2022-03-09 3:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-03-09 3:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-09 10:11 ` Ergus
2022-03-09 11:46 ` Ergus
2022-03-09 13:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-09 13:46 ` Po Lu
2022-03-09 17:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-03-09 17:41 ` Ergus
2022-03-10 0:42 ` Po Lu
2022-03-10 10:21 ` Ergus
2022-03-10 11:15 ` Po Lu
2022-03-10 14:03 ` Ergus
2022-03-10 18:50 ` Juri Linkov
2022-03-10 22:35 ` Ergus
2022-03-12 18:31 ` Juri Linkov
2022-03-13 14:58 ` Ergus
2022-03-12 0:17 ` Ergus
2022-03-12 18:34 ` Juri Linkov
2022-03-13 11:21 ` Ergus
2022-03-13 17:44 ` Juri Linkov
2022-03-13 18:50 ` Ergus
2022-03-13 18:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-13 19:49 ` Ergus
2022-03-13 20:48 ` Drew Adams [this message]
2022-03-13 21:15 ` [External] : " Ergus
2022-03-13 23:14 ` Drew Adams
2022-03-13 23:38 ` Ergus
2022-03-14 2:23 ` Drew Adams
2022-03-12 20:25 ` Drew Adams
2022-03-09 14:30 ` Ergus
2022-03-09 16:14 ` [PATCH] " Ergus
2022-03-09 16:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-09 13:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-09 14:22 ` Ergus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SJ0PR10MB5488322127622168E9B8A751F30E9@SJ0PR10MB5488.namprd10.prod.outlook.com \
--to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=juri@linkov.net \
--cc=luangruo@yahoo.com \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=spacibba@aol.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.