From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "niDapeng" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: "undo" really can replace "redo" Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:21:36 +0800 (CST) Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1077514035 24990 80.91.224.253 (23 Feb 2004 05:27:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 05:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 23 06:27:09 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Av8cX-0008BE-00 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 06:27:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Av8a7-00044x-NZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:24:39 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1Av8Zn-00044h-7o for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:24:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1Av8ZG-0003TM-Au for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.140.60.50] (helo=21cn.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Av8Yt-0002Ub-Bg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 21cn.com([10.2.2.2]) by 21cn.com(AIMC 2.9.5.6) with SMTP id jm84039b25f; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:22:17 +0800 X-AIMailer: AIMC 2.9.5.6 2002.10.10 X-AIMime: MIME/SMIME Lib 2.9 2.9 2002.10.10 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Priority: 3 X-Originating-IP: 170.252.155.65 X-AIMC-AUTH: (null) X-AIMC-MAILFROM: steveneo@21cn.com X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:17078 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:17078 I know Emacs use "killing-ring" concept to cicle undo, and 'redo' operation is implicitly done under this cicle. But, is it really good way? When I set killing-ring size enough large, the "redo" is turing very boring when I miss the correct position of ring. For instance, if my current killing-ring size is 200, I try to undo last the 40th step operation, but, unfortunately, I undo 41 times. At this case, I have 2 choices, one is keep undoing until the cycle is back(so boring, and I have to very careful to prevent next mistake). Another way, is I manually to mend the 41th operation(maybe type some text again). Hi, Emacs gurus, my "redo" concept is correctly? I have to be familiar such operation? Certainly, I know there is redo.el available for this. But why emacs doesn't take "redo" as default package? Thanks Dapeng ---------------------------------------------- 玩游戏赢数码相机、MP3、U盘 http://mail.21cn.com/huodong/0310/ 中美日韩高中生性调查:日女生性观念最开放 http://news.21cn.com/huahua/ 广东ADSL用户有着数，21CN商务邮免费领 http://mail.21cn.com/vip 希腊前总理与美艳空姐闹出桃色性丑闻(图) http://news.21cn.com/social/