From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: non-ASCII cut/paste emacs <-> mozilla Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:56:24 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026795569 25208 127.0.0.1 (16 Jul 2002 04:59:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 04:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17UKQq-0006YT-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 06:59:28 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17UKbc-0003ls-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:10:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UKQl-0000fS-00; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:59:23 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UKPx-0000eU-00; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA17263; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:56:25 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5776 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5776 On 16 Jul 2002, Miles Bader wrote: > It seems as if it's just mozilla's problem, but I'm rather astonished > that it can't even deal with latin-1 characters. Me too. Does setting selection-coding-system to latin-1 change anything for Latin-1 characters? > Also, does anyone know of any low-level tools that cat be used to > directly send/receive binary data to/from the X cut buffer mechanism, so > I can reduce the variables to one program? Not really the answer you wanted, but using raw-text as selection-coding-system is one possibility to do something like that.