From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More .cvsignore entries? Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:42:06 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207152010.g6FKADX26334@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026794724 23922 127.0.0.1 (16 Jul 2002 04:45:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 04:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17UKDD-0006Dj-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 06:45:23 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17UKNz-0003Tj-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 06:56:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UKD7-00005A-00; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UKCB-0008RB-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:44:19 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA17150; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:42:07 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <200207152010.g6FKADX26334@rum.cs.yale.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5774 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5774 On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote: > BTW, I'm mildly annoyed at the use of @copying since my texinfo > burps on it saying it's an unknown command. I'm using texinfo-4.1 > from RedHat-7.3 which is not ancient in my book. > Until now, texinfo-4.0 was enough. FWIW, I agree: it's not a good idea to require the latest Texinfo so close to its release (although the CVS version is supposed to be ``not for the faint of heart''). I'd suggest to wait for at least the next release, or for several more months, whichever comes first. > Is @copying really important ? I guess it's important for Richard, since he asked for that feature. AFAIK, its importance is that it guarantees the copying conditions are output in all formats supported by makeinfo, especially HTML (where until now there was no copyright notice at all).