From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ehelp woes, or why I hate a module that I love so much Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:13:46 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020704092157.4CB2.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025784831 8292 127.0.0.1 (4 Jul 2002 12:13:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 12:13:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q5Ud-00029d-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 14:13:51 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q5ac-0007Ws-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 14:20:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q55m-00028s-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 07:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q3eX-0003Eo-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 06:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA01564; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:13:47 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: <20020704092157.4CB2.LEKTU@terra.es> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5451 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5451 On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > Yeah, well, with that logic we all should sort together the TODO in > order of decreasing importance AFAIK, it already is sorted. > Yesterday I > spent two hours hunting down typos. I'm *sure* most Emacs users won't > ever notice, but personally I feel a lot more confortable when I do C-h C-f > some-function and don't see mispellings in its docstring. Don't worry about this, your contributions are most welcome, as those of anyone else. You have every reason to be proud. > With your view, > I should be ashamed of spending the time on this, instead of doing some > worthwhile work. Richard will surely reply, but I'm confident he didn't mean that you should be ashamed for working on Emacs.