From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 13:10:02 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025604921 26394 127.0.0.1 (2 Jul 2002 10:15:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Mailing List Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17PKgr-0006rb-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:15:21 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17PKlp-0006te-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:20:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PKgZ-0004er-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 06:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PKdj-0004P8-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 06:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA10244; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 13:10:02 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5315 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5315 On 2 Jul 2002, Miles Bader wrote: > I think the current scheme, of using high-numbered > minor versions, is much better than the scheme linux uses. Yes, I agree. Btw, there are other GNU projects that use the same numbering scheme for alpha versions.