From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jidanni@deadspam.com: modeline doesn't divulge buffer will go bye bye] Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 07:57:26 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200206222012.g5MKC9I16834@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024808410 10002 127.0.0.1 (23 Jun 2002 05:00:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17LzTu-0002bD-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 07:00:10 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17LzUP-0001Wx-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 07:00:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17LzTz-0004Gg-00; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:00:15 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17LzTC-0004AP-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 00:59:26 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA07799; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 07:57:26 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <200206222012.g5MKC9I16834@rum.cs.yale.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5113 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5113 On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I don't think we should actively support this "create buffer and then save" > model of creating files, because it suffers from the fact that it doesn't > know which major-mode to use for the buffer (plus other limitations > like the lack of auto-saving etc...). How about adding some code so that when you kill a buffer created by the user (as opposed to buffers created by commands as part of their operation), Emacs will ask whether to save it?