From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:42:05 +0300 (IDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020613143834.29167D-100000@is>
References: <20020613121400.E9FB.LEKTU@terra.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023968730 8732 127.0.0.1 (13 Jun 2002 11:45:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:45:30 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17IT2g-0002Gj-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:45:30 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17ITQx-0003B6-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:10:35 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17IT2U-00068g-00; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 07:45:18 -0400
Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17IT1K-0005xB-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 07:44:06 -0400
Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA29488;
	Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:42:06 +0300 (IDT)
X-Sender: eliz@is
Original-To: Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es>
In-Reply-To: <20020613121400.E9FB.LEKTU@terra.es>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4827
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4827


On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Juanma Barranquero wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:21:17 +0300 (IDT), Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> wrote:
> 
> > That is, what modules are present in the list submitted to make-docfile on each 
> > platform, and which explain these differences?
> 
> See the list below.

Thanks!

> > the question is whether all platforms should have the doc strings of those.
> 
> That seems like a good idea, but it'll pose a maintenance burden, I
> think.

What maintenance burden did you have in mind?  All we need is make sure 
make-docfile is invoked with the same list of files on all platforms.

> > And then there are some symbols like ucs-* and others which should have 
> > been in DOC on all systems--can you see why they aren't?
> 
> Don't know why the relevant files (like lisp/international/ucs-tables)
> aren't included. An oversight, perhaps?

The interesting question is why are doc strings from ucs-tables seen on 
Unix and GNU/Linux systems, but not on Windows?