From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Enhancements to options menu (was Re: Reveal mode) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 17:15:32 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200205081405.g48E5fI04663@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020867671 18058 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2002 14:21:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Simon Josefsson , ttn@glug.org, karl@freefriends.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 175SJb-0004h9-00 for ; Wed, 08 May 2002 16:21:11 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 175SRl-0005tF-00 for ; Wed, 08 May 2002 16:29:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 175SJb-00033P-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 10:21:11 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 175SHj-0002z2-00 for ; Wed, 08 May 2002 10:19:16 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA26049; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:15:32 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <200205081405.g48E5fI04663@rum.cs.yale.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3731 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3731 On Wed, 8 May 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I thought we were talking about extending/changing info.el to support the > HTML format (or a subset of it). Perhaps everybody else was, in which case I apologize for a gross misunderstanding. If extending info.el is the issue, I tend to agree with Kai: implementing a whole new browser sounds like a large job. Much larger than making it possible to display inline images in an Info file.