From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 07:46:00 +0300 (IDT)
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020429074505.22112A-100000@is>
References: <5l662eipi3.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020055712 8061 127.0.0.1 (29 Apr 2002 04:48:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 04:48:32 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@gnu.org
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17235T-00025u-00
	for <gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 06:48:31 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17235I-0005MK-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 00:48:20 -0400
Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17234f-0005Jm-00
	for <gnu-emacs-bug@gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 00:47:41 -0400
Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA22174;
	Mon, 29 Apr 2002 07:46:00 +0300 (IDT)
X-Sender: eliz@is
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier+gnu.emacs.bug/news/@RUM.cs.yale.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5l662eipi3.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:1019
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:1019


On 26 Apr 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote:

> I think all that we really care about is that the load+save trip is safe
> and that the content of the Emacs buffer looks "as right as possible".

The second part is the issue here: it's open to interpretation.