From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PO files and Emacs Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:53:02 +0200 (IST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1015829856 22090 80.91.224.249 (11 Mar 2002 06:57:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Neil Darlow , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, sanvila@unex.es, haible@ilog.fr, handa@etl.go.jp Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16kJkW-0005kB-00 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:57:36 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16kJm1-0006xf-00 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:59:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16kJk2-0000Or-00; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:57:06 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16kJjA-0000Nt-00; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:56:12 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA15383; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:53:03 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Karl Eichwalder In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:1847 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1847 On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Karl Eichwalder wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > If not, could someone please try to show such a Lisp fragment? > > Neil said it's possible to reproduce the problem using po.el; is this > small enough for debugging? Something smaller would be more useful. Failing that, please show the fragment in po-mode which was failing, and please identify the offending variable/function. I'm asking for this because your past message seemed to imply that some infrastructure in Emacs was misbehaving. I'd like to find out what infrastructure is that, so that I could dig into that. TIA _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel