From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PO files and Emacs Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:46:02 +0200 (IST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1015825722 21156 80.91.224.249 (11 Mar 2002 05:48:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 05:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, keichwa@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, sanvila@unex.es, haible@ilog.fr, handa@etl.go.jp Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16kIfq-0005V7-00 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:48:42 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16kIhQ-0006V3-00 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:50:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16kIfG-0004Zl-00; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16kIeU-0004Z1-00; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:47:18 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA14627; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:46:03 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Neil Darlow In-Reply-To: <20020310.11103600@ideal.darlow.co.uk> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:1843 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1843 On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Neil Darlow wrote: > This whole discussion came about as a result of a bug report I filed > against the Debian packaging of emacs-21.1. > > The situation is that po.el generates an argument type error when emacs > is started on a non-existant .po[tx] file. In response to that (or so I thought), Karl said something about Emacs assuming that ``'filename is 1 the first time''. That sounded like some problem outside po-mode.el, so I asked for a simple Lisp example that could be used to reproduce this without po-mode. Did I misunderstand? If not, could someone please try to show such a Lisp fragment? _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel