From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Killing buffers with mouse Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:46:51 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173458863 28460 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2007 16:47:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 09 17:47:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HPiFc-0003vw-Lm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:47:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPiFv-0000SO-HZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:47:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HPiFl-0000SJ-1g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:47:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HPiFj-0000Rx-3c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:47:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPiFi-0000Ru-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: from postino2.roma1.infn.it ([141.108.26.25]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HPiFG-00074N-G4; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:47:06 -0500 Original-Received: from ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it (ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it [141.108.26.19]) by postino2.roma1.infn.it (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l29Gktms029615; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:46:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (graziosi@localhost) by ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA09671; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:46:51 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.3.9.81933 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FRAUD_419_BADTHINGS 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67631 Archived-At: On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 02:06:14 +0100 (MET) > > From: Angelo Graziosi > > cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > When the mouse pointer (an arrow) is on the 'X' icon (Discard current > > buffer) of the toolbar, moving the wheel of the mouse, without clicking, > > causes the killing of the buffer. > > I don't see this in the native Windows version. Could people please > try this on Unix? I have seen the same thing on Linux-kubuntu (32 bit) and on Scientific Linux (64 bit) (and on Cygwin 32 bit). After moving the wheel (when the pointer is on the 'X' icon of the toolbar) and the buffer is killed, I observe in the minibuffer: tool-bar kill-buffer i.e. the same thing that happens when I kill the buffer clicking with MOUSE-1 on that icon. In other words, it seems that moving the wheel on that icon has the same result of clicking with MOUSE-1 on it. > > Angelo, please tell what do you see in the buffer displayed by "C-h l" > after you move the wheel over that toolbar icon. (That's a letter > ell, not the digit one in "C-h l".) > Regarding this point, after moving the wheel, C-h l (the lowercase of L), I have an help buffer: --------------------------------------------- C-h l C-y C-h l --------------------------------------------- but I am not sure that what you mean is what I have understood. Cheers, Angelo.