From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs-cvs on Cygwin Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:16:17 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159611419 4705 80.91.229.2 (30 Sep 2006 10:16:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 30 12:16:55 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTbtt-00035N-5A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:16:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTbts-0006kD-BW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GTbtf-0006fw-5p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GTbtc-0006Xu-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTbtb-0006Xk-V0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:16:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [141.108.26.15] (helo=postino1.roma1.infn.it) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GTbz4-0001BI-Gy; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:22:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it (ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it [141.108.26.19]) by postino1.roma1.infn.it (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8UAGIMf017943; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:16:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (graziosi@localhost) by ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA06904; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:16:17 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.3.2, Antispam-Data: 2006.9.30.23443 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_PHRASE_7 0' X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60325 Archived-At: On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:18:00 +0200 (MET DST) > > From: Angelo Graziosi > > cc: storm@cua.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > The problem is localized between lines > > > > > > 1072 # People get bothered when... > > ..... ..... > > > > 1110 end > > This is somewhat tangential to the real problem at hand, but as long > as we are talking about this: what happens if you remove all that > block from .gdbinit, type "gdb ./emacs.exe" in the src directory, and > then manually type the commands in the offending block, one after the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ???? > other? I'm particularly interested to know whether you see any error > messages from GDB, and if so, which line causes these messages. This is not clear: - I remove the blocks A,B,C from .gdbinit - then start gdb ./emacs... - then add a line at time of the removed blocks: Add to .gdbinit or at GDB prompt ? As I wrote, removing the block C causes GDB sayd .gdbinit has errors. Cheers Angelo. > > > (gdb) xpr > > Lisp_Symbol > > $2 = (struct Lisp_Symbol *) 0x7d8bf888 > > Cannot access memory at address 0x7d8bf88c > > (gdb) > > Kim, any clever ideas, before we ask Angelo to look in last_marked[] > array etc.? > > > I want to flag that on Cygwin mailing list there are peoples that have > > similar problems with GDB > > (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-09/msg00534.html). > > Yes, I've seen that thread, but I don't see any useful (i.e., that > explain what's going on and why) responses to the problem it reported. >