From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: root Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2303: Acknowledgement (23.0.90; listing by label not reliable) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:00:23 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <3895-Thu12Feb2009090503+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> Reply-To: root , 2303@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234504158 3041 80.91.229.12 (13 Feb 2009 05:49:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jpff To: 2303@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 13 06:50:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LXqwK-00068q-Tx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:50:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54206 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXqv0-0008Dv-Od for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:48:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXYjQ-0008KV-GX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:23:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXYjJ-0008G5-5l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35216 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXYjI-0008Fj-S8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:23:36 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:53805) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXYjH-0004vD-W5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:23:36 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1CANXrs017937; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:23:34 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n1CA55sM013321; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:05:05 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: root Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:05:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2303 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2303-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2303.123443283212412 (code B ref 2303); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:05:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2303) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Feb 2009 10:00:32 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from codemist.co.uk (Debian-exim@west.codemist.co.uk [217.155.197.248] (may be forged)) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1CA0TDn012406 for <2303@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:00:30 -0800 Original-Received: from root (helo=localhost) by codemist.co.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LXYMp-0007SV-Oi; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:00:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:23:37 -0500 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:47:17 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:25275 Archived-At: More information. It seems to depend on the order of the keywords in the X-RMAIL-KEYWORDS list. I found that listing by "codemist" showed messages tagged "codemist, codered" while listing by "codered" did not. Not looked at code yet ==John ff