From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [abraham@dina.kvl.dk: Re: CC (was: Re: kill ring menu)] Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:25:38 +0200 (CEST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200205030819.g438JTZ28797@hamm.pajato.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020414800 25114 127.0.0.1 (3 May 2002 08:33:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 08:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 173YVE-0006Wx-00 for ; Fri, 03 May 2002 10:33:20 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 173Yaq-0003Ln-00 for ; Fri, 03 May 2002 10:39:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 173YPY-0000p9-00; Fri, 03 May 2002 04:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net ([217.13.230.178] helo=yxa.extundo.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 173YNs-0000Rq-00; Fri, 03 May 2002 04:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from yxa.extundo.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g438PcKg025505; Fri, 3 May 2002 10:25:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (jas@localhost) by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.2/8.12.1/Submit) with ESMTP id g438PcFS025502; Fri, 3 May 2002 10:25:38 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: yxa.extundo.com: jas owned process doing -bs Original-To: Paul Michael Reilly In-Reply-To: <200205030819.g438JTZ28797@hamm.pajato.com> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3523 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3523 On Fri, 3 May 2002, Paul Michael Reilly wrote: > While this is a News feature from what I can discern, I will implement > it in the Rmail reply command with the following semantics: > > If either a Mail-Followup-To or Mail-Copies-To header exists in the > message being replied to AND the user has not edited the default > reply-to list at mail-send time, then the followup header(s) will be > processed and any mailboxes indicated by the header(s) will be > included in the reply. "never" and "nobody" will be treated as > synonymous, as will "always" and "poster". > > If the User edits the reply-to list, then one could argue that it is > the wish of the replier to ignore the wishes of the poster. One > could also argue that the intent of the original poster should be > heeded but I know that if I prune a reply-to list and my mail agent > chose to send the message to someone(s) I did not explicitly bless, I > would be mightily pissed. > > Would anyone care to make a case for adding custom variable support to > tailor the behavior further? I'm inclined not to do so if only to > keep the feature simple. > > Other comments? Only one: What about re-using the logic and code from message.el instead of re-implementing it?