From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Covici Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug on ognus 0.05 and emacs 21.2.50.1 Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 19:30:06 -0500 (EST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200204062230.g36MUYx19792@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018139607 867 127.0.0.1 (7 Apr 2002 00:33:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 00:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16u0cZ-0000Ds-00 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 02:33:27 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16u0qG-00040j-00 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 02:47:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16u0cC-0005IE-00; Sat, 06 Apr 2002 19:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from ccs.covici.com ([209.249.181.196]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16u0ZL-0003TO-00; Sat, 06 Apr 2002 19:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (covici@localhost) by ccs.covici.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g370U6tA032410; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 19:30:06 -0500 Original-To: Richard Stallman In-Reply-To: <200204062230.g36MUYx19792@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2433 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2433 I sent it before, but I can send it again or just describe it. alias joel_dejean "jfdejean@att.net" If you try it it complains that it cannot complete dejean which seems to mean that it is ignoring what is before the _ . If I imit the _ it now works correctly. On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Richard Stallman wrote: > It fixed the lisp error, but any alias with an _ still does not > work. > > Can you please send a precise self-contained test case of the current failure? > -- John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com