From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Josef Urban <urban@ktilinux.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Commenting invisible text
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:26:16 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0409301117530.13326-100000@ktilinux.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096536282 23836 80.91.229.6 (30 Sep 2004 09:24:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:24:42 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 30 11:24:27 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CCxAp-0006kk-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:24:27 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CCxHC-0002KV-Ni
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:31:02 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CCxGo-0002Jz-Sm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:30:39 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CCxGo-0002JL-7X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:30:38 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCxGn-0002J8-UE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:30:38 -0400
Original-Received: from [195.113.20.71] (helo=smtp1.ms.mff.cuni.cz)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1CCxAN-0003G5-1q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:23:59 -0400
Original-Received: from ktilinux.ms.mff.cuni.cz (ktilinux.ms.mff.cuni.cz
	[195.113.17.207])
	by smtp1.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8U9NtbF029041
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:23:55 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from urban@ktilinux.ms.mff.cuni.cz)
Original-Received: from localhost (urban@localhost)
	by ktilinux.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id
	i8U9QGX13594
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:26:16 +0200
Original-To: <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27692
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27692


Hi,

running 'comment-region on a block containing some invisible lines does 
not comment the invisible lines. I get this behavior with Hide/Show and 
also with other kinds of invisible text. 

Should not this be fixed in newcomment.el? If it is a feature (why?), 
should not there be at least some customization?

Thanks,
Josef Urban