From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Subject: C-M-j or M-j? What's going on with these bindings?
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:23:07 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1040426141146.273B-100000@acm.acm> (raw)
M-j and C-M-j are both bound to `indent-new-comment-line'. These
bindings are adjacent to eachother in .../lisp/bindings.el.
This seems a bit like a waste of a good binding.
The documentation (in programs.texi) mentions only C-M-j, not M-j.
Intuitively, M-j seems to me to be the better binding - as well as being
easier to type, it's kind of the arithmetic mean of C-j and M-;.
I think programs.texi should mention both bindings.
What's up with these bindings and their documentation?
--
Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
reply other threads:[~2004-04-26 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.3.96.1040426141146.273B-100000@acm.acm \
--to=acm@muc.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.