From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alp Aker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any objection to adding a unicode footnote style? (encoding fixed) Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 13:06:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <83oc3djmda.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4e1jesg.fsf@gnu.org> <83bozcjqu9.fsf@gnu.org> <874o53g9xv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k4dzj1vo.fsf@gnu.org> <87iptjetd4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83hb93iz9n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304962208 16648 80.91.229.12 (9 May 2011 17:30:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 19:30:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUHT-0002PK-Gr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:30:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41432 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUHT-0007W6-2b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJTvA-0002El-4V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJTv9-00014z-8L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exprod7og124.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.26]:44471) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJTv7-00014c-KN; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:06:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mb2i1.ns.pitt.edu ([136.142.11.153]) by exprod7ob124.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTcgfLm277rx1n6PYYlftPYdc/GnS9lLG@postini.com; Mon, 09 May 2011 10:06:57 PDT Original-Received: from unixs1.cis.pitt.edu ([136.142.4.246]) by pitt.edu (PMDF V6.3-x11 #31505) with ESMTP id <0LKX0056IU7IH8@mb2i1.ns.pitt.edu>; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:06:54 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <83hb93iz9n.fsf@gnu.org> X-X-Sender: aker@unixs1.cis.pitt.edu X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 64.18.2.26 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 May 2011 13:30:01 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139288 Archived-At: > AFAIK, what you see on NextStep is how it works on _any_ GUI display. > The implementation is device-independent. Making the digit smaller > (with `height', as I show in my other message) alleviates the effect > on the line height to some degree. I don't think you're right here. A (raise 0.5) display spec on NextStep increases the line height, and does nothing else. It doesn't change the vertical position of the character relative to the baseline.