There is a related bug: #38749.
在 2020年1月4日 +0800 PM6:49，Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>，写道：
> Hello, Alan.
>
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 11:27:57 +0000, Alan Third wrote:
> > One small annoyance I’ve had with developing Emacs is that the
> > helpers for filling in the changelog entries don’t work with Objective
> > C methods. I’ve tried writing a patch to make it work.
>
> > For reference, an Objective C class looks something like:
>
> > @implementation ClassName
>
> > - (int)doSomething
> > {
> > /* do that something */
> > return 1;
> > }
>
> > - (void)doSomethingTo: (SomeClass *)object with: (int)someParam
> > {
> > return;
> > }
>
> > @end
>
> > And I think the methods’ names should be written something like:
>
> > -[ClassName doSomething]
> > -[ClassName doSomethingTo:with:]
>
> > The ‘-’ means it’s an instance method and a ‘+’ would mean it was a
> > class method.
>
> If either ClassName or doSomethingTo is long, you might be taking up too
> much space on, for example, the first line of a commit message. But
> you've probably already thought this through. How long are these
> extended names in practice?
>
> > It appears to work for me, but I’m not great at Emacs lisp so I
> > thought it best to run this by the mailing list in case I’ve made any
> > boneheaded errors.
>
> I've got just a few comments to add to Eli's and Stefan's, so ....
>
> > Thanks!
> > --
> > Alan Third
>
> > > > From 2945f1c6c57eeabdbeb8e7c058070587a9bf4c0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Alan Third <alan@idiocy.org>
> > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:38:47 +0000
> > Subject: [PATCH] Add ability to find ObjC method names
>
> > * lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el (c-defun-name-1): Add Objective-C method
> > name ability.
> > ---
> > lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> > diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el b/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el
> > index 0343f9df32..9165398132 100644
> > --- a/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el
> > +++ b/lisp/progmodes/cc-cmds.el
> > @@ -2024,6 +2024,36 @@ c-defun-name-1
> > (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
> > (point))))
>
> > + ((looking-at "[-+]\\s-*(") ; Objective-C method
>
> I'd be happier here if you could also check we're really in Objc with
> (c-major-mode-is 'objc-mode).
>
> > + (let ((class
> > + (save-excursion
> > + (re-search-backward "@\\(implementation\\|class\\|interface\\)")
>
> Here, you might want to give a NOERROR argument to re-search-backward,
> so that if implementation etc., isn't found, you can handle the error
> gracefully. Something like
>
> (if (re-search-backward "@\\(....\\)" nil t)
> (progn
> (c-forward-token-2)
> .....)
> "")
>
> > + (c-forward-token-2)
> > + (thing-at-point 'word t)))
> > + (type (buffer-substring-no-properties (point) (+ (point) 1)))
> > + (name
> > + (save-excursion
> > + (c-forward-token-2 2 t)
>
> c-forward-token-2 might not be the best function, here. It moves to the
> next token, but if there isn't a next token it doesn't move at all.
> c-forward-over-token-and-ws might be better. Alternatively, you could
> check the result of c-forward-token-2 (say, with zerop) and take special
> action if the call has failed. This comment also applies to the later
> uses of c-forward-token-2.
>
> > + (let ((name ""))
>
> I feel there ought to be a standard CC Mode function which would do the
> following scanning to the {, but I can't find it at the moment.
>
> > + (while (not (looking-at "[{;]"))
>
> Or, (not (memq (char-after) '(?{ ?\;))), which would be minutely faster.
> It would also not change the match-data if you cared about that (which
> you don't, here).
>
> > + (let ((start (point))
> > + (end
> > + (progn
> > + (c-forward-syntactic-ws)
> > + (forward-word)
> > + (if (looking-at ":")
> > + (+ (point) 1)
> > + (point)))))
> > + (when (looking-at ":")
> > + (c-forward-token-2)
> > + (if (looking-at "(")
> > + (c-forward-token-2 2 t)
> > + (c-forward-token-2 1 t)))
> > + (c-forward-syntactic-ws)
> > + (setq name (concat name (buffer-substring-no-properties start end)))))
>
> Just a small point: isn't name always the empty string before this form?
> If so, you could get rid of the concat and just use
> buffer-substring-no-properties.
>
> > + name))))
> > + (format "%s[%s %s]" type class name)))
>
> As an alternative to format, you could use (concat type "[" class " "
> name "]")
> , which is more direct, but probably doesn't matter here.
>
> > +
> > (t ; Normal function or initializer.
> > (when (looking-at c-defun-type-name-decl-key) ; struct, etc.
> > (goto-char (match-end 0))
> > --
> > 2.24.0
>
> --
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
>