From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Abraham S.A.H." via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: 10 problems with Elisp, part 10 (was: Re: Emacs website, Lisp, and other) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 18:59:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: Reply-To: "Abraham S.A.H." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20622"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 06 19:00:33 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sbNXz-0005Ck-NK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2024 19:00:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sbNXK-00019Y-9w; Tue, 06 Aug 2024 12:59:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sbNXH-00018G-K5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2024 12:59:48 -0400 Original-Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sbNXF-00023q-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2024 12:59:46 -0400 Original-Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56EDFBFCBC for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:59:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1722963581; s=s1; d=tuta.io; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=vhV4z0sx4nqEcGMy1sAARKMffdIWU569kLk94pe/sf0=; b=20r5dt5+AIHbPFBmuCHeKRlvhqyJv2AyKkI+fjmQqDtEiNYpDNuFulP1cd2z4Q9X jMK0v4oRfOlirqLpdIwQZ/pm0vLmFsg1LP8hmgJTifKIY1KGKucbgfAjIjYnLdACc4J kyM1mnZHXKF12e8ui7RHswYn2Cu0DZ+GAC64HUYL/IbAp48Ucz719mt2hczmzNV9Fka Usd9FkdQEII8T7qi4X2XDnVzj1aY4Z7xB6DEFGZNMiozda3JlCD4LsdJ+cbmsWoTqnn L36jTmbq3Yi0VXCnkT17WB908dAStElalApKm/uYrFjcvOJczfz4qu+LT4S1cmrCyJM G8aq77I/vA== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.162; envelope-from=arash.sah@tuta.io; helo=w1.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:322452 Archived-At: >=C2=A0Moving point around I thought it's the strengh point of Emacs.=C2=A0=C2=A0 Why =E2=80=9CEverything being a buffer=E2=80=9D is bad?=C2=A0 Other than be= ing tired of it? Sounds like people who talk about their frustration with Unix's =E2=80=9Cev= erything is a file=E2=80=9D concept. Can you explain this with more logics and examples?