From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: uzibalqa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: [External] : Re: Making new menu after Tools using keymap-set-after Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 17:37:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83ilag63ji.fsf@gnu.org> <878rbcp8qp.fsf@gmail.com> <83ilaf509w.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg3ronqj.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35222"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Robert Pluim , "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" , Eli Zaretskii To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 19 19:38:14 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qMB7t-0008uM-OW for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 19:38:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMB7a-000291-0o; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:37:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMB7Y-00028f-E2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:37:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4324.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.24]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMB7W-0000rL-6b for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:37:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1689788267; x=1690047467; bh=GuvIFF7STbMA+GQMJcYPCKu+vI3hCGRL5AarJoTm1TU=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=KoiuYkL0kOViFDSd8s3MJ7qd3ZaX0Wbnzda6puAYByjlbHETSgub1RX+zExunbQS6 DoZBghjNjzDRwXaqxahzIDtFy+DHchbhQFpS1SX3G1CLi32Vl02yCh06B7lLYktvEc XfgHQjLQg8W+PoZHhHWtvNZ0XQ1F9vO5a9v5R3gLp0aFXJaPf+VYQIkT9S05exr+4o OEg5Us1BMJLeNy35FO60gvpA3+RcvTlUVASk3pJSMZxMgTUsQSQsihuj7GS9Fy/jmC 5p+p5uX22bwLtVr8ygowbK7nC+vOumDiwQ/mfyD07SgDs79F+AEbz4KqqWSVYXRspy wtNjxgg9yppIg== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 52887082:user:proton Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.24; envelope-from=uzibalqa@proton.me; helo=mail-4324.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:144343 Archived-At: ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, July 20th, 2023 at 5:28 AM, Drew Adams = wrote: > > GNU Emacs 29.0.50 > >=20 > > Why is it so difficult to know the snapshot version after doing > > a clone or a checkout on master. Rather than just emacs, can the > > directory produced include the version (e.g. emacs-29.0.50). >=20 >=20 > Why does a new Elisp learner prefer to use > an unreleased pretest version of Emacs? To test that the menu with the new keymap-set-after I am using works.=20 =20 > Seems like asking for additional trouble, > with not so much ability to tell whether > something is a new-feature bug or part of > what Emacs has long done (tried and true, > tested and well-used). >=20 > Like learning to drive in a test version > of a new car. Maybe exciting, but maybe > not so great for learning what's what - > can't tell what's intended from what just > happens to be part of a not-fully-baked > current implementation. It is not so much fun, I admit. =20 > Why not learn Emacs using the latest > release, Emacs 28.2?