From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-29 b8d2ec920f: Revert "Improve last change to xfaces.c" (05ece1eb8b) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:03:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <167080778504.14972.16819452979975432761@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20221212011625.58E8AC004B4@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <877cyxjqd8.fsf@yahoo.com> <83bko8spmi.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9674"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 12 16:06:59 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p4kOR-0002KC-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:06:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4kLu-0007nV-NE; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4kLb-0007d9-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:04:08 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4kLa-0003HK-9E; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:04:03 -0500 Original-Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B401710602E8; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1670857439; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=EQYLZn6/lJiJ5uNkMdguvkZmfUuu4ZSS+IVSyytTkhg=; b=kdinzUPzTENBubObM1nFA0O5L9vYu2GLwoViyUHsL3xmNBY1qbqlSGC7Fa0FOmiV GHN7rEs1ytx65jLkWNTtNFiET/mG6T8FUa9VAtIKkqTcYmjEuuauG74b4gNCyNa2Qmt 4W/E7dIqM6+h4uPdTuK7zTAWgA+ubedrb6iRCpOiA2URlJ9RLDRjxmkaNZ/Op6gQ9Zw 3MK04XSuD/l7TESvvyiVJevLFvKnGToJLMuGnTkPVCOoG14G15zKYTP6SaEnDIDGwXy Tper97PVwTmavhlyelMmWG+sU/nit/d0vQiOoBF4jOPH2DiOyh+aBO5AKi86JaumSJx Yw/O1lxOqA== In-Reply-To: <83bko8spmi.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301240 Archived-At: Dec 12, 2022, 13:44 by eliz@gnu.org: >> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:18:01 +0100 (CET) >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Gregory Heytings >> From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." >> >> Your definition of improvement seems to be based on whoever you are >> trying to irritate at the moment.=C2=A0 From this penchant for a little = bit >> of trolling I was suspecting that you are brat, now I am certain. >> > > This is a warning: please stop these ad-hominem attacks, or your posts > here will be moderated. > > There will be no further warnings. > Ah, I forgot how only your prot=C3=A9g=C3=A9 has the right to these "ad-hom= inem attacks."=C2=A0 Well go ahead, it's probably better for me anyway.=C2=A0 No= t so sure about maintainers or Emacs though, with this head in the sand approach.=C2=A0 Giving authority to brats like PL is yet another great decision for driving Emacs into further obscurity, congratulations if that is the intent.=C2=A0 Bye.