From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On Contributing To Emacs Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:08:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <83zgoopkwb.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20470"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 25 20:10:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n1CQl-0005CT-Ag for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:10:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1CQj-0000uC-W8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 14:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1CPb-0000E1-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 14:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]:49218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1CPa-0002jK-3Y; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 14:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D45A10602DE; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 19:08:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1640459336; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=4FpFrK3krJd/KDkgadgsU+WcJhWZ8pKZpbRhuEze9vA=; b=AEHrZLvzj1Jx7WZSk+s4yua/OMPfKYIj7bs1D0Xf/fPSo3OxAKYQA/7LTsRRsD76 D0t4LL83j9NqF98V7g0NR056WXJG0nRvwwsHf7ZbzcggTSQ85g+X5+HoMb3M1nKbvxF U0cigMvab6dYxgvHFcfrmyt6UYl5jYoYANIgJFtfyyuRrtVCBeVXJhmpUBuLq6eRmvG yhHbggDt8jiNjrNb9y7u55KP2FpJDkZrjutDLfYXuLWvsiebjJJILLs26kEnTf5T4i3 qdYvKkYcbkJrCGOVBMd3LQ5aRv6Ri2LnOXCujO61YhIOLtUKyA1ZAJkt1YCP9sts+Wa DGran9xwoQ== In-Reply-To: <83zgoopkwb.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283240 Archived-At: Dec 25, 2021, 22:03 by eliz@gnu.org: > I don't think I understand what you are saying, but the changes > proposed there were installed 6 months later. > What I meant was that straight.el should have been a part of Emacs, in some form, as an improvement of package.el infrastructure. Instead, the actual change contributed was primarily a way to disable package.el. Feel free to take this post down, if it is found inappropriate.