From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Development Speed Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:48:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <83r1a4yfpt.fsf@gnu.org> <8335mky4rl.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0fvh1zp.fsf@yahoo.com> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7335"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: luangruo@yahoo.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 23 14:50:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0OTn-0001fD-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:49:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0OTl-00038d-QM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 08:49:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0OSb-0001Xe-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 08:48:45 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]:46740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0OSY-0007pp-OD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 08:48:44 -0500 Original-Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4110B106015F; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:48:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1640267312; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=0hpo5Vb2lqZqkgHwLRr6mtlmoHTbphuVCWmojcJU8sc=; b=b8j8LMHefX8HYEaTyHlfibjt0ksYsQrzfN4koA06m/UgvHsRgUVDDKycMOu3Di7D rdGvdKUeTvKsnc/DK8DU4/FGP5B5bl9kdmaFRhYqHuOE4ZO6Nk9sRD/JE6xrFvUMwND ti2Wl7oAobqIHfZGbxiuEOx9zHhOvSwtUrW2C8SHv/GbObHxtaBgKD+OvkjdU432BqC udVMj2XSY57FmmQchCOyLfi3tDZ8GckJSIX3+XMdBEZ45zIRocMhgb8j2xPeQzkNpy3 w0FfiMvRYFDw6Jse7UpHxNwXWbVgQhOmqSED/1W1MnXCz55jnrBftyJkNCBO7KGUxQA dTpa67CNJQ== In-Reply-To: <87k0fvh1zp.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282954 Archived-At: Dec 23, 2021, 16:42 by luangruo@yahoo.com: > No. If that happens in GCC, then it is a bug. > Yes, that's the point.=C2=A0 It is a lot more likely to happen as the focus is on new standard.