On Tuesday, November 7th, 2023 at 03:25, Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMO it makes more sense to use prev-sibling:
> 
> ,@(ignore-errors
> (treesit-query-capture 'cmake '((body) @capture))
> `(((parent-is "body") prev-sibling 0)))
> 
> This would allow users to manually adjust the indentation of a line and have the rest of the body follow that.

This would be much more elegant but unfortunately that and my previous patch failed to account for the following:

1 if(TRUE) # Comment.
2 endif()

And place POINT at the end of line 1 and hit RET. It will indent to the start of the comment :(. However, you gave me an idea: use the grand-parent as the anchor (which in this case is the if - exactly what we want). I've attached a new patch which accounts for that.

Juan, thanks for testing the first patch. Please give this new one a whirl if you're able to.

> 
> As for why parent-bol returns the BOL of the comment line, that’s expected: The parent is body, and body starts at the comment, so of course the beginning of the parent line is the beginning of the comment line. In the image below, the highlighted portion marks the body node.
> 
> Some tree-sitter grammar would mark the beginning of body at the end of if(TRUE), but what tree-sitter-cmake does here is equally valid.

Thanks, I understand what's happening now. Whenever line_comment is NOT the first child, the beginning of body is at the end of if(TRUE). If line_comment is the first child, then the beginning of body is at the start of the comment. I was expecting them to behave the same - that's why I was so confused, and I don't really understand why it was done that way.