From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Heime Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Lisp error on function :documentation Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:55:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87sfjo5vqu.fsf@web.de> <87mt9w5thu.fsf@web.de> <3aB3F8gotn0WkauCkikmQoG0bt-Zp1vYKKnElDvKwDmZOU2aICFsw5ojkVJWw6dG9fnzRZXpE0YTcdLIfIfHYIwKO3ghyRwQZ7OUsNc8CXc=@protonmail.com> <87a65wz9sn.fsf@web.de> <87czarfka0.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2197"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 03:56:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1okFMj-0000Qb-Jt for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:56:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46350 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okFMi-0003GH-0q for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:56:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okFLj-0003G8-Vd for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:55:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4319.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.19]:26233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okFLi-0004Rd-0a for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:55:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1665971723; x=1666230923; bh=51ZN5e8dmWeAZIhuBDHhU8T/6igtHBzFng4CcMSqLmM=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=GIXMPdcLL9pIBXQSPZmjz5ujMYEeLfRk8mSz71BfGwhhhOCIVhV3v2NhxYKtLcpOr F7aL2K+qTHj0rcjnstcSPgBrP6dHncTRhrtifoe1Z+alpFe2cqY0wVKIGuwfe5AYuE 9WnqyTifQ+UY8P9co2zoPCzJ30IK3OcW809QI3UGaA+RL+UdRta49Hd1KgQbv8NcPJ qzgPhmRcZiXHDrkzgRaG+sXoHwFUfdfdPadYUL24suRRxUrFxP4EM28Srs4/WXzZ6I 54CZV+ceU0kTigNdB9fSstMbKVPmPNOO3gKdQpGKjfQJuHhyA+oVa7np2/4PJkobkt Kj+3GtToF7MaQ== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 57735886:user:proton Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.19; envelope-from=heimeborgia@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4319.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:140051 Archived-At: ------- Original Message ------- On Monday, October 17th, 2022 at 1:00 AM, Stefan Monnier via Users list for= the GNU Emacs text editor wrote: > Heime [2022-10-16 23:09:08] wrote: >=20 > > You all seem more interested in trying to satisfy your intellect than > > helping out on the actual question by the OP. >=20 >=20 > I'm definitely here to satisfy my intellect: guilty as charged. >=20 > But as for the OP, I showed how I tried to reproduce it, and how > `:documentation` worked for me. I'm not sure what more I can do at that > point: I'm just waiting for a description of the OP that's precise > enough to be reproduced. Was able to get it work with the lexical binding setup, which was not worki= ng as expected. I had no criticisms about your response. My only difficulty is whether you recommend using such undocumented feature (commonly people v= ote against using them). Being able to append to the documentation part a deta= ils string is very strong programmatically. I would like that an equivalent=20 implementation be done and documented for public use. Otherwise I would co= ntinue having to delay the addition until after the function definition. =20 > And in the mean time, I'm promoting OClosures :-) >=20 > Stefan As for closures, the recommendation against examining and altering the structure of closure objects indicates that something very wrong in going on.=20