From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: ndame Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:33:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8wXYP4GY9hwW-9mYv6_LGMETZ8Vz3Ob1Bec6yh6kPT7yxjTkxA3V6dXY4ELra9tYiJUxJmgXKSIEX4w8HFiPRoeGVSQHDSoBVy1voj1e3Qo=@protonmail.com> <833694f29y.fsf@gnu.org> <4amRIW9fznS6sa3th4xPABzua9LQDlNPeIFxVsGYdq_wsg4-Ea1l9sEP-T6QrnO5QMV3jhgrnAspk2mSIC7COlodqr04koAcIPYPLLmPHFM=@protonmail.com> <83imhzecc5.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2qvcjv6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: ndame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="82275"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "yandros@gmail.com" , "dgutov@yandex.ru" , "rms@gnu.org" , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 16 21:35:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jPAIE-000LIG-EK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:35:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38464 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPAID-0005OX-Fk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:35:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPAGW-0003Vj-Hw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPAGU-0004eg-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.135]:50405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPAGL-0004Zi-Sy; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:33:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1587065604; bh=eRH8WP4PiEDHdruXf1P0NE+RVI3qZHnB5oagqFXA44g=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DisZnMObRuMMQQY1blcjepIBJLND5e+l5c6ZHCbqe6OPkRQ31chZOpG1J9BanZl0A gkLc66sCrLk7BjqoKFrGYSIKWGFjHtpnQyKI4VhoYO29XmQKrpLQxfuHR0YKssU3Ez 3QxD35iJVhZgFPHDcy8pU2bpM64cmZ2GHuMujAkI= In-Reply-To: <83y2qvcjv6.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.135 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247123 Archived-At: > > Feel free to point us to GPLed icons that can be incorporated in > Emacs. At the time, the situation was nowhere as easy as you imply, > but maybe things have changed since then. Aren't the icons used by GTK/Gnome GPL licensed? I assumed they were if GTK/Gnome uses them.