From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Dyballa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: gnu vs. xemacs Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:10:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1167219981.424569.215160@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167225150 11127 80.91.229.10 (27 Dec 2006 13:12:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 27 14:12:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GzYa1-0007ep-Sr for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:12:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GzYa1-000184-B7 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:12:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GzYYj-00008G-KD for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:11:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GzYYf-0008UY-F3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GzYYf-0008U8-5k for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:11:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [217.72.192.234] (helo=fmmailgate03.web.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GzYYb-0002RB-V6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:10:59 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp05.web.de (fmsmtp05.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.4.166]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C116B4B8A20D; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:10:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [87.193.64.142] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (WEB.DE 4.107 #114) id 1GzYYa-00033B-00; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:10:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1167219981.424569.215160@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> X-Image-Url: http://homepage.mac.com/sparifankal/.cv/thumbs/me.thumbnail Original-To: H. X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Sender: Peter_Dyballa@web.de X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:39948 Archived-At: Am 27.12.2006 um 12:46 schrieb H.: > I was just curious why people in this community prefer gnu over =20 > xemacs, > or if that is the case, and, whatever your preference is, why you feel > that way. I'm neutral myself, being just a beginner. All opinions > welcome. For instance, perhaps these difference forks are good for > different things...? GNU Emacs uses the key bindings I am used to. It can be compiled as Carbon Emacs, X11 client in so many tastes, =20 COCOA/OPENSTEP application, and as non-windowing programme for =20 Terminal or xterm on Mac OS X. -- Greetings Pete =93I hope to die before I *have* to use Microsoft Word.=94 - Donald E. Knuth, 2001-10-02 in T=FCbingen.