From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: feedback on customize -- apropos-groups et al Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:03:03 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097514223 19997 80.91.229.6 (11 Oct 2004 17:03:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 11 19:03:29 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CH3a5-0000ht-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:03:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CH3h1-00026j-Su for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CH3go-000261-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:10:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CH3gn-00025D-0L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CH3gm-000253-Sq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [141.146.126.231] (helo=agminet04.oracle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CH3Zj-0001x6-UI; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (rgmgw1.us.oracle.com [138.1.191.10]) by agminet04.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i9BH34lr032023; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:03:04 -0700 Original-Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i9BH34SN018037; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:03:04 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap (dradams-lap.us.oracle.com [130.35.177.126]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with SMTP id i9BH33BS018027; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:03:03 -0600 Original-To: , "Lennart Borgman" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28243 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28243 Yes, underlined is better, by default. It is what people are used to, and the underline indicates clearly (conventionally) that something is a link. users mostly want web page links to look just like default links. This is blue underlined. Does this change do what you suggest? What do people think of it?