From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35770: [PATCH] Broken duplicate case elimination in switch byte-compilation Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 13:11:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <91DFE4D0-BDB6-4365-BA51-A2A3F209177C@acm.org> <752237291204505cd6b3fb98f667c2718fa6361f.camel@acm.org> <7C514C39-A204-44F4-A806-0B7DC3F4E6B4@acm.org> <83sgt67o2x.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="156209"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Stefan Monnier , vibhavp@gmail.com, 35770@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 22 13:12:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hTPAK-000eW1-Er for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 13:12:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40380 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTPAJ-0003K1-AN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:12:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTPAB-0003Jt-Sw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:12:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTPAB-0002ib-43 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTPAA-0002iJ-P7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hTPAA-0006HT-HD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 11:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35770 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35770-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35770.155852349424090 (code B ref 35770); Wed, 22 May 2019 11:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35770) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2019 11:11:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hTP9i-0006GU-0T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:11:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail1424c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.24]:42448 helo=mail102c50.megamailservers.eu) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hTP9e-0006GC-HJ for 35770@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:11:32 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1558523483; bh=Bu/ZWpWPlh8wPB993Bb1RM7tCK8/hSPLiw2f7DwGqnU=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=XISnTgdEQOakOUBlkp1HZO3j6RuJOX5eaewIwc2d/yShFHGiu++OeUh922XHysd7e GVNlNUvkkY2ee7wyZ18yEoVDdSG8Ov5L2PMSWatmczXAFcrPisRF88b8DtirwOq9bb yQigH0+/Ntay7kUPC8SYx9k3yja1VIXGnrbusetQ= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] ([188.150.171.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail102c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id x4MBBKt9004321; Wed, 22 May 2019 11:11:22 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83sgt67o2x.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0208.5CE52E5B.0054, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=F7x5iJpN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:117 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=nKfW0Xvq2rv5CtYeUCIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159645 Archived-At: 22 maj 2019 kl. 12.58 skrev Eli Zaretskii : >=20 > However, in this case I really wonder why we should be so eager to > install the change on the emacs-26 branch. How long this wrong code > has been with us? About two years, and it only matters for (arguably) buggy code, so you = are probably right. On the other hand, different behaviour in compiled and interpreted code = does not make it easier to find such bugs.