From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Carsten Dominik Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2? Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:06:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7b501d5c0908091634ndfba631vd9db6502db301097@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249888003 13017 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2009 07:06:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 10 09:06:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MaOxn-0003e4-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:06:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41985 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaOxm-0007DT-VF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:06:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaOxi-0007DO-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:06:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaOxd-0007Cx-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:06:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46369 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaOxd-0007Cu-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:06:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:20261) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaOxd-0004vc-1w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:06:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com ([209.85.219.211]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaOxc-0004DN-5X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:06:24 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so3052588ewy.42 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:06:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=4pm2XDArhre5TZrxgTnHpvcKSL2a+d46uaNdH8Uhq5I=; b=HNoDeVhkZG8BKr0TtaswP4aP+pUYt1CsAv2xWsYlxALpQIjEOKid9Jm22soqeA4A+Z L83IZnXbns6gwMiSInYYM9mAby6P/Ajf32vNjfpb5EMZ2tMFZB69KwV2FfBE/FR0ausH TQLznW+5KOIabIxBAzhHIAlWbhT5h//VIV8Zk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=vBo1gZJXWOzdWkzzBTtF8izIZgRCd7kkb+MxApQW4SyR+ix+hxfFiTQonhCJNElbCy eXqzuRdEySRENJucswelXwLVG+tU7RUNYICTJwkwSN3ioJpjMpUk3ajOWPfpuAEmCkuV fQFjRg362GEL+gtc8K9WRrsGP/FuUjPjNBATk= Original-Received: by 10.210.129.6 with SMTP id b6mr2639049ebd.70.1249887982756; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from omhp-uva-23-23.wireless.uva.nl (omhp-uva-23-23.wireless.uva.nl [145.18.23.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm10393242eyx.23.2009.08.10.00.06.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:06:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Detected-Operating-System: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113949 Archived-At: On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:18 AM, Leo wrote: > On 2009-08-10 00:58 +0100, Daniel Colascione wrote: >>> Could you please make sure espresso-mode follows Emacs >>> conventions? I >>> am not sure but I think there were some thing that could be fixed. >> >> The only issue I'm aware of is that espresso-mode syntactically >> fontifies the whole buffer > > eval-after-load should not be used in emacs packages. Why not? - Carsten