From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9571: 24.0.50; user option to turn off bidi, please Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:46:38 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87obybg01n.fsf@gmail.com> <87hb43fsq0.fsf@gmail.com> <83zkhvr07u.fsf@gnu.org> <631B4E70034844D78E123FF1527968C2@us.oracle.com> <83mxdvqhee.fsf@gnu.org> <42AFDF737DB84A93858CA84ABA91A84D@us.oracle.com> <83fwjnqbxs.fsf@gnu.org> <1EB39F8E0391465CB3F1803054CAF35D@us.oracle.com> <249B07D27CD640E69D493B6FC05CD73E@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316840022 11667 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2011 04:53:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9571@debbugs.gnu.org, stepnem@gmail.com To: "'Juanma Barranquero'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 24 06:53:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7KF6-0003hU-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 06:53:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50546 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7KF5-000244-VW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:53:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7KF3-00023y-7T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:53:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7KF2-0008H6-9v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:53:33 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7KF2-0008H2-8N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:53:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7KFV-0003FL-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9571 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 9571-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9571.131684003212463 (code B ref 9571); Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2011 04:53:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7KFL-0003Ey-VV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:53:52 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7KFI-0003Ep-MW for 9571@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:53:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rtcsinet21.oracle.com (rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p8O4r61c019248 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:53:17 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by rtcsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8O3klgH013529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Sep 2011 03:46:47 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt118.oracle.com (abhmt118.oracle.com [141.146.116.70]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p8O3kf9i007118; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:46:41 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.58.180) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:46:40 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acx6V1EzvQLQ9ucYSGmJ7KNBEYyI8AAEuNpQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 In-Reply-To: X-Source-IP: rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090209.4E7D623D.012A,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:54:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51759 Archived-At: > > Thinking, in fact, of you, Juanma, I read precisely that > > Wikipedia article BEFORE I wrote that sentence, being > > personally ignorant and indifferent to limbosity. > > Why, pray tell, thinking of me? Because I'm nitpicky enough to answer > to that, or because being a Spaniard I'm more likely to be Catholic > (which I theoretically am, but not in fact)? Because you are knowledgable in many historical and language matters and are wont to refer to Wikipedia. I read that article mainly because I had heard only vague things about limbo and wanted to get a little background before saying something completely incorrect, even if I was really only joking about the popular (and no doubt inaccurate) meaning of "limbo". Thinking of you in that regard was secondary, and only because, as I say, you are one who is both knowledgable and wont to correct inaccuracies even in non-technical matters. And yes, you can properly take that as a compliment, from someone who is also sometimes interested in non-software topics. > > "And perhaps never was" sums up the situation quite > > accurately, as I read that Wikipedia article. > > Sums up the situation quite accurately. Which is unrelated to any > recent change of status. We do agree, I fear.