From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Minimum frame size in Windows Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:42:45 -0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165941873 16769 80.91.229.10 (12 Dec 2006 16:44:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 12 17:44:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GuAk3-0007tv-L2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:44:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuAk3-0000cW-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:44:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GuAjs-0000cI-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:44:20 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GuAjq-0000bf-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:44:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuAjq-0000bX-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:44:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [141.146.126.228] (helo=agminet01.oracle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GuAjq-0002wu-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:44:18 -0500 Original-Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (rgmgw1.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.110]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id kBCGiF3V005669 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:44:15 -0600 Original-Received: from rcsmt251.oracle.com (rcsmt251.oracle.com [148.87.90.196]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id kBCGdX7i007243 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:44:14 -0700 Original-Received: from dhcp-amer-csvpn-gw2-141-144-73-226.vpn.oracle.com by rcsmt251.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2281321641165941768; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:42:48 -0700 Original-To: "Emacs Devel" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63635 Archived-At: > There's an old hack in src/w32fns.c to avoid the user resizing an > Emacs frame below the minimum tracking size (else the user can, for > example, make a window showing only a fraction of the window caption, > which looks ugly). >=20 > However, the hack is not working. I propose fixing it with the > following straightforward patch. Perhaps I don't understand correctly, but if this prevents users or Lisp = code from making frames smaller than the frame title, I am 100% against = it. I am probably against preventing users or Lisp code resizing a frame in = _any_ way, especially in C code that cannot easily be overridden in = Lisp. Please, hands off my ugly frames ;-).