all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Subject: RE: pp-eval-expression broken
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:52:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMCEBGCOAA.drew.adams@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BDEIJAFNGDOAGCJIPKPBEEMCCBAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>

I said:

> `pp-eval-expression' was apparently changed to no longer evaluate its
> argument. It evaluates only when called interactively. This breaks all
> Lisp calls to `pp-eval-expression' (except those with
> `call-interactively).
>
> This seems to have been changed by RMS on 2006-10-18:
>
>  "(pp-eval-expression): Use `X' to read value.
>  Non-interactive arg is the value, not the expression."
>
> PLEASE reverse this change. Why was it made?

Perhaps I shouldn't have been so strong about the request, and no doubt
there is a good reason for this change. But I'd still like to know what the
reason is.

It seems odd to me that the command would treat its arg differently, evaling
it if interactive and not evaling it otherwise. The function is
named -eval-, but it doesn't always eval.

And, as I said, this will break any existing Lisp calls to the function.
Those have been fixed in vanilla Emacs (22), but outside libraries will need
to adjust, especially if they try to work with multiple Emacs versions.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-05 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-05 15:51 pp-eval-expression broken Drew Adams
2007-01-05 17:52 ` Drew Adams [this message]
2007-01-05 18:58   ` Randal L. Schwartz
2007-01-05 19:14     ` Drew Adams
2007-01-06  2:55 ` Richard Stallman
2007-01-06  3:24   ` Drew Adams
2007-01-06  6:28     ` Drew Adams
2007-01-07  3:46     ` Richard Stallman
2007-01-09 22:56       ` Drew Adams
2007-01-13 22:27         ` Drew Adams
2007-01-14 14:45           ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMCEBGCOAA.drew.adams@oracle.com \
    --to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.