From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Jan_Dj=C3=A4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mac OS-compatible ports Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 11:36:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <9E637EAB-A0C5-421B-9CCA-71C41442AF52@gmail.com> <87ipl7zaea.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjkbib14.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87d3baui4b.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxacqlg4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwg3pfy4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8739c2dscy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ehvkdgfr.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325414200 16860 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2012 10:36:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 10:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 01 11:36:36 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhImK-0004G6-5w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 11:36:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhImJ-0003BO-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 05:36:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhImH-0003BH-GI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 05:36:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhImG-0008Qz-HR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 05:36:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:33990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhImG-0008Qe-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 05:36:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A3D9811 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2012 11:36:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 22303 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jan 2012 10:35:32 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 1 Jan 2012 10:35:32 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.248] (janiphone [172.20.199.248]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2755B7FA058; Sun, 1 Jan 2012 11:36:29 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 62.20.26.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147114 Archived-At: Hello. 1 jan 2012 kl. 07:26 skrev Leo : > On 2011-12-31 21:22 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> I agree with your statement, but we're not "pushing" the NS port only >> because it's for GNUstep. It's quite usable on Mac OS X. >=20 > I wonder how you reach that conclusion. If you don't use Emacs heavily > on a Mac, then you don't know if it is quite usable. My experience is > that it is not.=20 YMMV. I use Emacs every day on OSX and it is no different from using Emacs o= n X in my experience. But I don't use Gnus or other packages that people see= ms to have problems with. Jan D.=20=